|
Post by Son Anheuser on Sept 27, 2013 6:12:48 GMT -8
I knew it...
|
|
|
Post by True Ingéneurs on Sept 27, 2013 6:16:56 GMT -8
Good Morning guys. 1. Son, what did you know exactly? I'm assuming Amer, but don't want to read back to what you said. 2. Did I miss the murder by the Assassin? 3. Did anyone get a message from Pete? I didn’t. 4. Poor Farrell. He was a good Diplomat for Mildville.
|
|
Annie McClarabow
Super Person
Owner of "All-Night Library"
Pay your library tab, errr I mean fines
Posts: 531
|
Post by Annie McClarabow on Sept 27, 2013 6:27:24 GMT -8
Good Morning guys. 1. Son, what did you know exactly? I'm assuming Amer, but don't want to read back to what you said. 2. Did I miss the murder by the Assassin? 3. Did anyone get a message from Pete? I didn’t. 4. Poor Farrell. He was a good Diplomat for Mildville. The assassin killed Amer too. I didn't get a message from Pete - I'd like to know what happened. Did he really get too loaded to send messages?! Farrell will be missed!
|
|
|
Post by Deviant Pennybags on Sept 27, 2013 6:29:08 GMT -8
I was wondering the same thing True, then I realized that when Evan brought up the assassin and Amer's corpse I realized the Assassin also chose Amer to die, or at least that's what I'm assuming. So did the assassin play it safe and was pm'd by Pete and chose to lay low and just pick Amer, or was it someone that Pete didn't pm and it was a coincidence. If the later is true, then the people Pete pm'd are not the assassin, but really, we have no idea. I think I drank too much coffee this morning and I might be over thinking.
|
|
|
Post by True Ingéneurs on Sept 27, 2013 6:47:55 GMT -8
What the heck Stabby & Neutrino? dorks! Not productive! No ice cream for you!
|
|
Annie McClarabow
Super Person
Owner of "All-Night Library"
Pay your library tab, errr I mean fines
Posts: 531
|
Post by Annie McClarabow on Sept 27, 2013 6:53:18 GMT -8
What the heck Stabby & Neutrino? dorks! Not productive! No ice cream for you! Yea! Leave your BRH/family drama at the door!
|
|
|
Post by Neutrino Esquire on Sept 27, 2013 8:14:11 GMT -8
*sad puppy eyes*
|
|
|
Post by Stinky Pete on Sept 27, 2013 8:26:37 GMT -8
I instructed Tulley through Amer to vote for Annie, and I instructed Stabby through Farrell to vote Amer
|
|
Annie McClarabow
Super Person
Owner of "All-Night Library"
Pay your library tab, errr I mean fines
Posts: 531
|
Post by Annie McClarabow on Sept 27, 2013 8:30:27 GMT -8
I instructed Tulley through Amer to vote for Annie, and I instructed Stabby through Farrell to vote Amer Did you intend to do more?
|
|
|
Post by Son Anheuser on Sept 27, 2013 9:17:38 GMT -8
I told Stinky that I thought Amer was a spy and we needed to put him to the poly. Anyway I think this plan of voting for active players is the way to go as it gives the diplomats their only advantage. it may tip off the spies but if we keep things quiet I think it works better overall
|
|
|
Post by True Ingéneurs on Sept 27, 2013 9:34:18 GMT -8
Neut & Stab are you guys really suspicious of each other? hmm Stab, you didn't follow Pete?
|
|
Annie McClarabow
Super Person
Owner of "All-Night Library"
Pay your library tab, errr I mean fines
Posts: 531
|
Post by Annie McClarabow on Sept 27, 2013 9:36:05 GMT -8
I told Stinky that I thought Amer was a spy and we needed to put him to the poly. Anyway I think this plan of voting for active players is the way to go as it gives the diplomats their only advantage. it may tip off the spies but if we keep things quiet I think it works better overall Aren't the spies likely to kill off the active players if we keep poly graphing them? Stinky passed the poly last week and everyone followed his lead this week without knowing his plan. That makes him a huge target. And the spies whacked Farrell so they seem to be going after the more active players. I don't know. I'm still not convinced that we should be risking the actives.
|
|
|
Post by Neutrino Esquire on Sept 27, 2013 10:08:18 GMT -8
Neut & Stab are you guys really suspicious of each other? hmm Stab, you didn't follow Pete? Nope, I didn't really take last week too seriously. I told Stabby I was voting for him yesterday just for kicks. I think he did the same. As for why he didn't follow Pete/Farrell, he didn't really sign in at all yesterday so I guess he didn't know...
|
|
|
Post by True Ingéneurs on Sept 27, 2013 10:13:13 GMT -8
It does kind of suck having 3-5 people I would consider inactive.. 3 of them didn't vote 2 weeks in a row.. I wish there was a way of booting them faster with out having to use our kills/polys on them.
The game at the end wouldn't be fun if one of the spies is an inactive. We'd have to randomly pick one them off each week.. It would be nice to get that step out of the way now so the end of the game is more heated and more fun for the players who were dedicated and made it to the end.
However, so far I don't think it's smart for dips to go after inactive spies because active spies would want to go after active diplomats?
It could work if both spies and diplomats agreed to go after inactives? At the same time, I feel hesitant proposing a "voting plan." I mostly just wanted to address my thoughts on why I lean torwards going after actives, I'd be afraid to not do it.
|
|
|
Post by Son Anheuser on Sept 27, 2013 10:35:29 GMT -8
I told Stinky that I thought Amer was a spy and we needed to put him to the poly. Anyway I think this plan of voting for active players is the way to go as it gives the diplomats their only advantage. it may tip off the spies but if we keep things quiet I think it works better overall Aren't the spies likely to kill off the active players if we keep poly graphing them? Stinky passed the poly last week and everyone followed his lead this week without knowing his plan. That makes him a huge target. And the spies whacked Farrell so they seem to be going after the more active players. I don't know. I'm still not convinced that we should be risking the actives. I think the spies are apt to go after active diplomats no matter what. At least going after active players gives us a shot of nailing an active spy.
|
|
|
Post by Ron Wednesday on Sept 27, 2013 10:36:14 GMT -8
I don't know. I'm still not convinced that we should be risking the actives. This keeps coming up and I"m still lost to the logic. There is literally no risk in our poly votes. None. No one poly'd has died, other than Amer. Hell, Pete got the royal treatment. The only one this thinking benefits is the spies, which is now clearly why Amer argued for it.
|
|
Super Sarah
Super Person
Dancer
Mildtropolis: safe from Coronavirus but the crowd will kill you!
Posts: 381
|
Post by Super Sarah on Sept 27, 2013 10:46:30 GMT -8
Woot Woot we got one!!! ;D
I didn't get official instructions from Pete, but I told him I voted for Amer already just in case he didn't get back to me. The reason I voted for him was mostly a hunch, but I based that on the fact that he wrote a program to win the first immunity challenge and tried to cast doubt on the fact that I won fairly. Secondly, he was trying to derail Pete's voting plan convincing everyone to "vote randomly" because he knew he would have less of a chance if he was a suspect.
|
|
|
Post by Neutrino Esquire on Sept 27, 2013 10:46:44 GMT -8
It does kind of suck having 3-5 people I would consider inactive.. 3 of them didn't vote 2 weeks in a row.. I wish there was a way of booting them faster with out having to use our kills/polys on them. The game at the end wouldn't be fun if one of the spies is an inactive. We'd have to randomly pick one them off each week.. It would be nice to get that step out of the way now so the end of the game is more heated and more fun for the players who were dedicated and made it to the end. However, so far I don't think it's smart for dips to go after inactive spies because active spies would want to go after active diplomats? It could work if both spies and diplomats agreed to go after inactives? At the same time, I feel hesitant proposing a "voting plan." I mostly just wanted to address my thoughts on why I lean torwards going after actives, I'd be afraid to not do it. Didn't Evan mention something about a rule where if you don't vote 2 or 3 weeks in a row, you're automatically eliminated? I'm too lazy to go find that thread but I think it was last season.
|
|
Super Sarah
Super Person
Dancer
Mildtropolis: safe from Coronavirus but the crowd will kill you!
Posts: 381
|
Post by Super Sarah on Sept 27, 2013 11:32:06 GMT -8
Wanna see something funny? go back to the long thread and look at Amer's posts, knowing that he's a spy now. Hindsight is 20/20 but it looked pretty obvious.
|
|
Farrell
Super Person
Bureau of Investigation Agent
Posts: 398
|
Post by Farrell on Sept 27, 2013 11:40:35 GMT -8
Amer was acting spylike since day1. Be was as vocal as other games but this timehis arguments made no rational sense, unlike past games where he was good.
|
|