|
Post by Evan on May 4, 2020 13:17:56 GMT -8
Here
|
|
|
Post by Mike Lenin on May 4, 2020 15:58:57 GMT -8
I was off with Amer, kinda right at the beginning about Ron Wednesday, but when given the chance to survive, the whole, "undecided vote" when it was between him and buzzfly, made me think that he was a villain, and my anger shrouded my reasoning and I voted for him.
Personally, I'm suspicious of Buzzfly, and the basis of this is not reliable. I think he is less than honest. In his post history, he uses three different versions of "am". -"ama" "am" and "I'm". My guess is this is an unintentional slipup with managing multiple identities.
Also, Annie is totally suspicious in her initial actions of, "I'm gonna vote buzzfly" and when there was some heat on buzzfly, and she could have turned the mob, she opted to hold the hardline, making me think that the initial vote was a red herring, and then if Ron would have joined in, and Stinky, then buzzfly would have been in danger. Also, Annie2 suggests that there is an Annie1 that does criminal stuff at the night. Though, that's kinda weak.
I'm also suspicious of Stinky. This is because Stinky made long elaborate and elegant posts that overwhelmed us all, but in reality didn't say anything, and he was willing to jump sides after an auspicious prolonged absence during the day, but then used some reasoning to change his mind. For someone well versed in the twitterverse, and who uses an argument of authority detecting baloney, I call his actions as well versed baloney.
But Ron Wednesday has a good point that stinky is in a class of his own. So I'm going with the idea that there are at least three almost credible villains---Buzzfly, Annie, and I think Stinky.
|
|
|
Post by Neutrino Esquire on May 4, 2020 16:10:05 GMT -8
My sources tell me that Trebec was visiting Son last night...
|
|
annie2
Super Person
I sense fiendish activity afoot.
Posts: 84
|
Post by annie2 on May 4, 2020 16:19:46 GMT -8
A poll would be handy here. I can't figure how to set one up from my phone...
|
|
|
Post by stinkypete on May 4, 2020 16:42:44 GMT -8
Okay, I was hoping I'd be able to say "now who else has been using window dressing in their posts to fuzz their public perception," but that premise has failed. Nevertheless I still think it counts for something.
I'm excited to see what Son was able to get, looks like he got 2 chances.
Also, I suspect the villains would have a power reader, who would check Son as soon as he mentioned "someone might have the truth telling power," so anyone who was trying to get out of stating they're a hero is an easy red flag.
|
|
Mac Murdock
Super Person
Jazz Singer
To alcohol! The cause of -- and solution to -- all of life's problems.
Posts: 125
|
Post by Mac Murdock on May 4, 2020 17:51:18 GMT -8
Okay, I was hoping I'd be able to say "now who else has been using window dressing in their posts to fuzz their public perception," but that premise has failed. Nevertheless I still think it counts for something. I'm excited to see what Son was able to get, looks like he got 2 chances. Also, I suspect the villains would have a power reader, who would check Son as soon as he mentioned "someone might have the truth telling power," so anyone who was trying to get out of stating they're a hero is an easy red flag. who didn't go along with Son's attempt? Was it a short list?
|
|
|
Post by Mike Lenin on May 4, 2020 21:00:45 GMT -8
Hark ye, Annie and stinky are solid players that I think are coordinating a response together.
Irrational mobs don’t take polls or seek consensus. 3 versions of “am”!!. That should be reason enough in our shortened day cycle. I’d like to hear better arguments otherwise.
It appears these are diversionary tactics. If Annie was a hero, she would be investigating calling people out instead of slithering into consensus. And Stinky, whom I know likes logic and reason hasn’t challenged my reasoning yet, which makes me think he’s not fully committed to team hero.
Stinkys dramatic change in posting appears scripted.
IMO, both their posts to divert attention from buzzfly makes them appear culpable.
|
|
|
Post by merlotbrougham on May 5, 2020 6:59:30 GMT -8
So it looks like Trebec has some explaining to do.
Trebec, I watched you visit Ron Wednesday on night two as I had previously mentioned. Neutrino says his sources put you at sons last night. Son also died last night.
You have paticipated very little. Give us a reason not to just start throwing votes on you. What results have your powers given you that would help us find and eliminate villains?
Also, stinky, why do we think son would have gotten two chances? It says he only could use it every other week. Someone was protecting Annie when he tried to use his power against her on night 2.
|
|
|
Post by merlotbrougham on May 5, 2020 7:14:59 GMT -8
Also, Neutrino, during day 3 you solicited suggestions for who you should use your/Amer's power on during the night. Did you receive any specific suggestions to watch Trebec?
|
|
|
Post by Mike Lenin on May 5, 2020 9:17:56 GMT -8
So it looks like Trebec has some explaining to do. Trebec, I watched you visit Ron Wednesday on night two as I had previously mentioned. Neutrino says his sources put you at sons last night. Son also died last night. You have paticipated very little. Give us a reason not to just start throwing votes on you. What results have your powers given you that would help us find and eliminate villains? Also, stinky, why do we think son would have gotten two chances? It says he only could use it every other week. Someone was protecting Annie when he tried to use his power against her on night 2. Merlot, you reek of villainry. Ron Wednesday was suspicious af. I see this as a distraction against buzzfly.
|
|
|
Post by merlotbrougham on May 5, 2020 9:38:57 GMT -8
All Ron Wednesday ever did was try to hunt villains and get derailed for his efforts. What is your super power and what results have you gotten that will help us catch villains?
|
|
|
Post by bsketchy on May 5, 2020 10:27:00 GMT -8
Mike Lenin I tried following your erratic posts the last few days, and compiled a list of everyone you have called suspicious: - Ron Wednesday
- Bsketchy
- Annie
- Merlotbrougham
- Buzzfly
- Stinkypete
- Farrell
Did I miss anyone? Seems like you're ready to call out any players who are participating in the daily discussions (+Buzzfly). Also, last week's tactic of getting on board with Buzzfly, then jumping back on the Ron train was 100% pre-planned distraction and manipulation. I don't think you're offering very much hero help with your fuzzy logic and casual finger pointing. So, if you're not helping the heroes...
|
|
|
Post by Mike Lenin on May 5, 2020 12:28:13 GMT -8
Mike Lenin I tried following your erratic posts the last few days, and compiled a list of everyone you have called suspicious: - Ron Wednesday
- Bsketchy
- Annie
- Merlotbrougham
- Buzzfly
- Stinkypete
- Farrell
Did I miss anyone? Seems like you're ready to call out any players who are participating in the daily discussions (+Buzzfly). Also, last week's tactic of getting on board with Buzzfly, then jumping back on the Ron train was 100% pre-planned distraction and manipulation. I don't think you're offering very much hero help with your fuzzy logic and casual finger pointing. So, if you're not helping the heroes...
This is valid criticism. I'm confused and shooting around in the dark. Plus, am really not much of a good leader. I'm more of a heart person. And definitely not that machiavellian. I wish though. In the chaos, I think some villainry emerged with Annie and Buzzfly, so they have aroused my suspicions. Admittedly, the "am" three ways is the best reasoning I can think of. It was either between Ron Wednesday and Stinky, and Ron, in whatever choice he made in not wanting to get on board with buzzfly, pissed me off when he was on the chopping block, and made me think that he was protecting buzzfly. Plus stinky has been sketch. So, admittedly, I was wrong in logic with Amer, and almost right with Ron, but didn't follow through, because I wanted blood more than anything.
|
|
|
Post by Neutrino Esquire on May 5, 2020 13:42:50 GMT -8
Also, Neutrino, during day 3 you solicited suggestions for who you should use your/Amer's power on during the night. Did you receive any specific suggestions to watch Trebec? Yup, I asked for suggestions on who to spy on but the only suggestion that I got was to watch Ron. Since it was clear that Zac/Ron was going to die anyways, I decided to use my power to spy on Trebec instead. It was partly a crap shoot decision but I was also suspicious of Trebec for other reasons: - 1) she's married to jesse "codemonkey" in real life yet they voted differently (likely on different teams) - 2) she's semi-active and didn't follow the crowd during the vote In the end, we did get confirmation that Trebec visited Son on the night of Son's murder. Whether or not "visit" means "killing" is up for debate.
|
|
Mac Murdock
Super Person
Jazz Singer
To alcohol! The cause of -- and solution to -- all of life's problems.
Posts: 125
|
Post by Mac Murdock on May 5, 2020 13:50:39 GMT -8
Has anyone talked to Son? It would be great to hear what he has to says before the end of the shortened day.
I'd also like to hear what Trebec has to say in their defence. ..
|
|
trebec
Super Person
Need more ice for my alcohol #quarantini
Posts: 9
|
Post by trebec on May 5, 2020 18:31:57 GMT -8
I'd also like to hear what Trebec has to say in their defence. .. I was visiting Son to learn the capabilities of his power.
|
|
Stabby
Super Person
Posts: 107
|
Post by Stabby on May 5, 2020 19:11:53 GMT -8
I'd also like to hear what Trebec has to say in their defence. .. I was visiting Son to learn the capabilities of his power. So you visited son? Well he's already dead so we already know his power. Night 3 you visited son as you have stated. Night 2 you visited Ron? Why Ron? Night 1 who did you check then? And what is their powers? 3 out of 7 needed people are already voting for you. You need a stronger defense.
|
|
|
Post by stinkypete on May 5, 2020 19:45:22 GMT -8
Also, stinky, why do we think son would have gotten two chances? It says he only could use it every other week. Someone was protecting Annie when he tried to use his power against her on night 2. Oh damn, everyone getting blocked kind of blurred together for me. I wrote hoping he was given night 1 and night 3 So as much as Buzzfly still seems like an easy target, Trebec visited Son. Visiting Ron on night 2 makes sense to see if he's telling the truth about his power, and would explain a dissenting vote We've stated powers publicly, and a villain would be able to blindly confirm a hero's claimed power without much risk, so if it is her power, it's an unfortunate one for proving innocence. I agree that we need a better explanation from Trebec If she figured because he said someone "might" have a truth telling power that he had it, well that was my hypothesis why the villains killed him, but Trebec confirming he has the power wouldn't help us because that just matures on its own, so...
|
|
trebec
Super Person
Need more ice for my alcohol #quarantini
Posts: 9
|
Post by trebec on May 5, 2020 21:47:08 GMT -8
As most of you know, I am new to Mildville and on day/night one I was still in more of an observation mode than anything. I wasn't sure what to do so I didn't visit anyone. Stabby I mean, why did you visit Farrell during Night 1? Hmm?
|
|
|
Post by merlotbrougham on May 6, 2020 8:12:15 GMT -8
Minus the signup post, here is Trebec's entire contribution to the game up to this point with some observations: Late to the party, sorry. This is my first time playing Mildville! Thanks for the invite. A fish subscription? Tell us more! That was a rousing royal rumble! The commentators were a highlight! "Go grandma!" Being a true stickler for gameplay, secrets and abilities are usually kept a secret in games like Mildville (Werewolf, Town of Salem, etc) for a reason. Any person can claim to be any role and have any super power. With that being said, I want fellow citizens to know that I am good and believe in the heroes of Mildville. The bold emphasis is mine because you are later going to use the "I am new to Mildville" line. You hadn't participated at all, continued to not participate after, but make a point that you are a true stickler for gameplay and are familiar with games like this. That doesn't mix too well with you later claiming you are so new to Mildville and these concepts that you didn't use your super power on the first night because you weren't sure what to do. You finish that post with your carefully worded response to Son's request that we all say we are heroes we heros with a sentence that is entirely evasive and vague nothingness ( "I am good" / "I believe in the heroes" ). Let's compare/contrast MY reaction to Son's follow up with yours. Here's what I said about the issue: I agree. Regardless of any additional speculation about powers, nobody (certainly no hero) should have a problem making a post in this thread with the single sentence "I am a hero", like I did. Let's make it official. There have been some variations peopel have posted, but let's make it cut and dry. One sentence posts saying "I am a hero" . We lose absolutely nothing in doing so and if you're right about the powers, the only people who would actively reject the proposal are shady. It wasn't that hard to say "I am a hero", unless you were afraid of something. You can't pretend you didn't see the conversation. It's the only conversation you participated in this whole time, and you go out of your way to give a roundabout answer. Is that because you just can't say "I am a hero"? Is this happening already? I was visiting Son to learn the capabilities of his power. As most of you know, I am new to Mildville and on day/night one I was still in more of an observation mode than anything. I wasn't sure what to do so I didn't visit anyone. Stabby I mean, why did you visit Farrell during Night 1? Hmm? Just rounding out your entire post history, and the reason for visitng Son doesn't really make much sense either. I made my main points above though. Time's ticking, but I'll at least give you a chance to respond before casting a vote. We can get to stabby later.
|
|